Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scott Lane's avatar

Thank you for doing this work. It's a great illustration of how much deep thought is required to produce a credible response to a seemingly innocuous question. As someone who once wrote a letter to the editor of Forbes to complain about an article that clearly cherrypicked time periods to report on historical manufacturing employment, I can appreciate something like this. Great job.

Ryan Baker's avatar

Great analysis. The misuse of this data won't die though. I'm running into new mistakes in the viral commentary for the 2026 data. I came at this from a slightly different angle in a piece I published today: https://substack.norabble.com/p/or-equivalent-experience

I think the recurring belief in weak data here tells you something about biases. Those biases are also layering on unjustified job requirements.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?